March 21, 2012
Is President Obama keeping a Yemeni journalist in jail? A recent article
in The Nation, building on the work of freelance journalist Iona Craig and the
Yemeni press, has publicized the case of journalist Haidar Shaye and suggests
his investigation of a U.S. airstrike in Yemen is behind his continued
detainment.
According to the article, Shaye investigated a 2009 airstrike on a
village in southern Yemen, in which the Yemeni government claimed it had
carried out the strike targeting an Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
training camp. But Shaye’s investigation revealed that remnants of the
munitions used in the attack originated in the United States. He also claimed
that over a dozen civilians were killed in the attack. Shaye’s other reportage
included interviews with AQAP members, including the late Anwar al-Awlaki.
The Yemeni government later tried and convicted Shaye of having ties to
AQAP, but he rejected the court’s legitimacy. Former Yemeni president Ali
Abdullah Saleh announced his intention to pardon Shaye at the beginning of
2011, but it appears a concerned call from president Obama stayed the pardon
and kept Shaye in prison.
In follow-up questions posed to U.S. representatives in recent weeks,
the administration defended its assessment of Shaye but failed to provide any
further details: The American Ambassador to Yemen confirmed the U.S. conviction
that Shaye is an AQAP facilitator, while the National Security Staff spokesman
referenced Shaye’s involvement in AQAP and referred to the findings of the
Yemeni court. Both denied that U.S. concern had anything to do with Shaye’s
journalism.
So is Shaye an Al Qaeda facilitator or a journalist who turned over a
few too many sensitive rocks? I hesitate to pass judgment in such cases simply
because I don’t know all of the information. I don’t know what the U.S.
government knows, which presumably has classified information that backs its
concerns about Shaye. However, this unknown information highlights why the war
on Al Qaeda needs a good dose of transparency, especially when the United
States hopes to work so closely with a foreign government.
It is to the United States’ own detriment that it declines to contribute
its side of the story when all open source information suggests Shaye was
simply a journalist asking too many questions. By choosing not to reveal the
details behind its concerns, the U.S. government not only fails to address this
charge, but encourages the idea that any Yemeni it deems an inconvenience can
be detained at its request, regardless of that person’s rights or innocence.
If the United States wants to continue working closely with the Yemeni
government, it must earn the trust of the Yemeni people as well. Such trust
cannot be earned by refusing to participate in the public discourse, especially
regarding issues that challenge the legitimacy of U.S. counterterrorism
actions. The United States must be a full participant in the public discourse
in Yemen, especially regarding issues of terrorism. Ensuring transparency in
its actions is essential – the “just trust us” attitude will not fly.
The title of the Nation article poses the question, “Why Is President
Obama Keeping a Journalist in Prison in Yemen?” The truth is effective U.S.
strategy would make such a question irrelevant. The United States must learn to
be more transparent with the information upon which its actions are based. This
is especially true when working in foreign countries whose populations are
skeptical of taking the United States government at its word, yet whose trust
is essential in countering Al Qaeda.
No comments:
Post a Comment